• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

ASIC claims PayPal's contract terms unfair

08 September 2023 5:18AM

ASIC has commenced proceedings against PayPal Australia, alleging that its contract terms relating to errors in fees are unfair. ASIC said in its claim that PayPal’s standard form small business customer contract includes a term that gives business account holders 60 days to notify PayPal of any errors in fees that PayPal has charged them, or else accept those fees as accurate. The regulator said in a statement: “ASIC alleges the term is unfair because the effect is to permit PayPal to retain fees it has overcharged or wrongly charged if the small business does not notify PayPal of the error within 60 days of the fee appearing in its account statement. “We allege this term is unfair because it allows PayPal to escape the consequences of its own errors in overcharging small businesses and places additional burdens on small businesses to detect and correct charging errors.” It said the contract term causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract. Its claim said PayPal owes a duty to small business customers to keep accounts accurately and to render accurate account statements.  It also claims that a small business owes no obligation to PayPal to examine account statements or other account activity information to identify whether PayPal has overcharged and/or wrongly charged fees. ASIC is seeking a declaration that the term is void. It is also seeking injunctions and corrective orders. PayPal has been in the regulators’ sights this year. In March, AUSTRAC reported that the company would undertake remedial work on its reporting of international funds transfers, in response to concerns about the company’s systems, controls and governance in this area.  PayPal acknowledged AUSTRAC’s concerns and gave an enforceable undertaking to ensure compliance with AML/CTF law. 

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use