• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

US hedge funds speculate on second rate rigging class action

19 August 2016 3:56PM
Five Australian banks are among 18 defendants named in a lawsuit brought by a pair of US hedge funds that centres on allegations of manipulating short term interest rate benchmarks.Australia's four major banks and Macquarie have been sued in the US District Court by two US hedge funds and a derivatives trader.The applicants are Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Frontpoint Financial Services and some of its related funds and also Florida-based derivatives trader Richard Dennis.The two hedge funds are also applicants in a corresponding class action, begun in early July, amid allegations of a "massive conspiracy" to rig the prices of financial derivatives linked to Singapore's benchmark interest rates.In the case of the Australian banks, the US hedge funds' claim relies heavily on material uncovered, and beginning to reach the public domain, in civil cases bought by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission against ANZ, NAB and Westpac.In the statement of claim for the class action the plaintiffs assert that "collusive communications released in ASIC's filings show that defendants fixed BBSW-based derivatives prices using multiple means."These included "engaging in manipulative money market transactions during the BBSW fixing window; making false BBSW rate submissions that did not reflect actual transaction prices; uneconomically buying or selling money market instruments at a loss to cause artificial derivatives prices; and sharing proprietary information to align interests and avoid conduct that could harm conspiracy members." ANZ said in a statement it would be "vigorously defending the US class action complaint". AISC, ANZ, NAB and Westpac are all due on court next week for a further preliminary hearing on the ASIC matter.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Finance regulation

  • States take up the cudgels on eConveyancing
  • Firstmac failed design and distribution rules
  • 'Minimal' bankruptcy reforms tabled by Dreyfus

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con
  • Credit quality dogs Zip turnaround

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use