• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Privacy bill suits Senate reviewers

26 June 2013 4:38PM
An amendment to the Privacy Act, which will make the reporting of serious data breaches mandatory, has secured support from the Senate's Legal and Constitutional Affairs committee.If passed, the new law will take effect from March next year. It will require businesses, including banks and government agencies, to notify people when a serious data breach affecting their privacy occurs.A serious data breach is where there is a real risk of serious harm to the individual whose personal information has been exposed. The Government introduced the amendment in response to complaints that breaches were not being reported. The Australian Privacy Commissioner has criticised the current voluntary reporting system, saying that notifications have fallen despite an increase in the frequency of data breachesThe Senate recommended that organisations be forced to notify affected customers and the Privacy Commissioner when a breach of specified personal information occurs that gives rise to a "real risk of serious harm" to individuals."Real risk of harm", according to the committee, should also take into account whether the information was adequately encrypted or was acquired in good faith.The committee also recommended the definition of "specified personal information" be taken to include information such as a combination of name and address with a unique identifier like a Medicare or bank account number. The report noted that organisations would not be required to notify clients or customers if the Privacy Commissioner deemed it to not be in the public interest.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use