• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

NAB in strife over poor debt collection practices

27 October 2015 4:38PM
National Australia Bank has made changes to its debt collection practices following concerns by the regulator that its collection letters may have been misleading, deceptive or unconscionable.The Australian Securities and Investment Commission was unhappy that NAB was sending collection letters using letterheads for Fairhalsen Collections and Brunswick Collection Services.ASIC's view was that the letters may have given the impression that NAB had sold, outsourced or otherwise escalated a debt when this was not the case. Both entities are divisions of the bank but this was only disclosed in fine print at the bottom of the letters.ASIC was also concerned that letters sent to some customers stated that if the debt was not paid legal proceedings would commence or a debt collector might visit the customer's home, when such action would only be considered at a later stage of collection.NAB has removed references to the two companies from its collection letters. It has also removed the references to legal action and face-to-face contact with a debt collector.ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said in a statement: "Creditors and collectors are entitled to accurately explain the consequences of non-payment of a debt but the consequences must not be misrepresented or overstated."In annual reviews released last week the Financial Ombudsman Services and the Credit & Investments Ombudsman both highlighted poor debt collection practices as systemic issues they have had to deal with over the past year.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use