• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

More capital required for securitised assets

21 December 2012 5:36PM
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has released a consultation document proposing revisions to the Basel securitisation framework. The paper calls for a complete re-working of the way banks calculate how much capital they need to hold against potential losses affecting asset-backed securities. Under the proposed changes the minimum risk-weighting for securitised assets held by banks that use the internal ratings-based approach to calculate capital adequacy, will increase to 20 per cent. The current minimum is seven per cent, and an increase to 20 per cent will align with the minimum risk-weighting that must be applied by banks that use the standardised approach.The latest proposals come after the July 2009 enhancements to the Basel II framework (known as Basel 2.5), intended to address deficiencies identified during the financial crisis. The Committee subsequently agreed to conduct a more fundamental review of the securitisation framework, including its reliance on external ratings.The Committee identified a number of shortcomings within the current securitisation framework, categorised broadly as:• mechanistic reliance on external ratings;• inappropriately low risk-weights for highly rated securitisation exposures;• inappropriately high risk-weights for low-rated senior securitisation exposures;• cliff effects in capital requirements, following deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying pool.Complex enhancements to the current ratings-based approach and in the supervisory formula approach included in the Basel II securitisation framework are being proposed. The enhancements are intended to create more risk-sensitive and prudent calibration. The enhanced approach will also incorporate additional risk drivers, such as maturity.Comments from interested parties are requested by mid-March. If the proposed enhancements are implemented, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority can be expected to follow. This will impact on the four major banks that use the internal ratings-based approach to calculate capital adequacy, but it will remove a competitive disadvantage for the other banks, which use the standardised approach.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use