• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
ConfidentiallySpeaking.com.au Logo
High-impact negotiation masterclass | July 9 & 16, 2025 | 5:00pm - 8:30pm
This high-impact negotiation masterclass teaches practical strategies to help you succeed in challenging negotiations.
Register Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Levitt and Macquarie must re-negotiate Storm settlement

13 August 2013 4:37PM
Macquarie Bank will have to negotiate a fresh carve-up of the A$82.5 million offered in settlement of a long-running wrangle with investors who were advised by Storm Financial and funded by Macquarie.The full court of the Federal Court of Australia heard yesterday that an earlier settlement, reached in March, "cannot be said to be fair and reasonable to all group members. A substantial wrong has occurred which the court is obliged to correct."The Australian Securities and Investments Commission had moved to appeal the original settlement, which, it argued, favoured certain clients of the plaintiff law firm, Levitt Robinson Solicitors, who had chipped in to help fund the case.The original settlement had provided for the distribution of the settlement funds between approximately 1050 group members. The court said the size of the settlement pool "is not in issue"."The principal issue on appeal is whether the primary judge erred in finding that the distribution of the settlement sum between group members was fair and reasonable."ASIC had contested a component described as the "funders' premium", which, it argued,  not only compensated the funding group members, for the amounts paid by them by way of funding, but constituted an arbitrary profit and an unfair advantage to the funding group members at the expense of the remaining members.Justices Jacobson, Middleton and Gordon wrote at the conclusion of their judgement that "not only was there inequality of opportunity afforded to [some] group members to share in the funders' premium, but advantageous terms were offered, after the settlement was reached at the mediation.""Those terms were available only to clients of Levitt Robinson. "If there is an analogy, it is that a small number of group members (who were also clients of Levitt Robinson) were able to place a bet on a horse race after the race had run and knowing the result of the race."The judges said "the inequality was heightened by the ex post facto offer of highly attractive terms to a small group of Levitt Robinson clients after the settlement was announced on 15 March 2013."

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
ConfidentiallySpeaking.com.au Logo
High-impact negotiation masterclass | July 9 & 16, 2025 | 5:00pm - 8:30pm
This high-impact negotiation masterclass teaches practical strategies to help you succeed in challenging negotiations.
Register Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use