• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Fresh judgment for two banks on BBSW penalties

31 October 2017 5:57PM
Justice Jayne Jagot may settle the penalties that must be paid by National Australia Bank and ANZ for their misconduct in the bank bill swap market more than six years ago.Justice Jonathan Beach yesterday designated his Federal Court colleague Justice Jagot to handle the final phase of the ANZ and NAB matters. Beach has handled the BBSW rate rigging matter since ASIC launched civil action in early 2016. He will now prioritise the trial on this affair that ASIC, as plaintiff, must now centre on a single bank.Westpac, the third defendant in a series of linked cases, will be in the dock as ASIC opens its case this morning.Counsel for Westpac, in a brief hearing in Melbourne, reiterated the bank would continue to defend the matter. ASIC confirmed that it expected the trial to proceed, though settlements talks with Westpac must continue in the background.ASIC has alleged "that Westpac traded in a manner intended to create an artificial price for bank bills on 16 occasions during the period of 6 April 2010 and 6 June 2012."ASIC alleges that "Westpac was seeking to maximise its profit or minimise its loss to the detriment of those holding opposite positions to Westpac's."Witnesses for the trial are booked into late November, though Westpac's counsel has told justice Beach they will set out to shorten the hearing.ANZ's counsel, Alan Archibald, told the court the bank had concluded a settlement with ASIC.Neil Young, for NAB, told Justice Beach that the bank had also executed a settlement.ANZ and NAB have until next week to finalise an agreed statement of facts on the BBSW affair for Justice Jagot to determine for herself whether a penalty in the order of A$10 million is sanction enough.If Westpac settles in coming days, Justice Beach made clear he would wrap up the penalty assessment for all three banks.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use