• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
ConfidentiallySpeaking.com.au Logo
High-impact negotiation masterclass | July 9 & 16, 2025 | 5:00pm - 8:30pm
This high-impact negotiation masterclass teaches practical strategies to help you succeed in challenging negotiations.
Register Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Banking Royal Commission officially launched

19 December 2017 5:38PM
The Federal Government has published the formal terms - the Letters Patent - which contain the high level rules under which the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry will operate.These terms of reference, formally confirmed yesterday in a joint media release from Attorney-General George Brandis and Treasurer Scott Morrison, should come as no surprise.After all, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull outlined on 30 November that his government wanted to "ensure a responsible but comprehensive investigation into how financial institutions have dealt with cases of misconduct in the past, and whether those examples expose issues in terms of the cultural and governance issues in terms of the regulation and supervision of the industry." "It will cover the nation's banks - big and small - wealth managers, superannuation providers, and insurance companies. It will be a comprehensive inquiry."The terms of reference, as released yesterday, include these major points:•    whether any conduct by financial services entity - including directors, officers or employees - might have amounted to misconduct and, if so, whether legal action should be taken;•    whether any conduct practices or behaviour by financial services entities fall below community standards and expectations;•    whether the use of superannuation members' retirement savings by financial services entities does not meet community standards or is not in the best interest of members;•    whether any findings - presumably detrimental - are attributable to particular culture or governance practices of a specific financial services entity or, more generally, in "the relevant industry or relevant subsector"; or if these findings result from practices, including risk management, recruitment and remuneration practices, of a financial services entity or the relevant industry or relevant subsector;•    the effectiveness of methods of redress for consumers who suffer detriment as a result of misconduct by firms in the financial services sector (although the Commission will not be able to direct that compensation be paid);•    the effectiveness and ability of financial services regulators to identify and address misconduct will be scrutinised, and assessments made as to what changes are required to minimise the likelihood of misconduct by financial services firms in future; and•    the Royal Commission is encouraged to look at relevant overseas examples, comparable "international experience, practices and reforms" and to consider the effect of any legislative changes that are recommended.Under the Letters Patent, the Royal Commission is directed not to consider any matters that cross over into macro-prudential policy and regulation, defined as "the structure, role and purpose of financial regulators, that is concerned with containing systemic risk, which can have widespread implications for the financial sector as a whole."COMMENT: Interestingly, "financial services entity" is defined in the letters patent to include not only ADIs, insurance providers, a person or entity required to hold an Australian financial services licence, but also superannuation entities and "a person or entity that acts or holds itself out as acting as an intermediary between borrowers and lenders."That last clause would seem to draw in fintechs and owners of funding and financing platforms.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use