• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

ANZ, CBA settle BBSW 'fixing' claim

23 March 2021 5:50AM

ANZ and Commonwealth Bank have reached agreements with plaintiffs involved in a United States class action over alleged manipulation of the bank bill swap rate.

In separate announcements yesterday, the two banks said they had reached settlements “without admission of liability”. Both settlements are still subject to negotiation of the terms, execution of a deed of settlement and court approval.

Westpac reached a settlement last October.

A NAB spokesperson said claims against the bank were dismissed in February last year.

The class action was launched in 2016 and involved 17 banks and two global broking houses.

The plaintiffs claimed that from at least 2003 the banks and brokers “co-ordinated manipulative transactions” during the rate fix window – the brief period during which rates are set each day.

They allegedly did this by “artificially increasing or decreasing the supply of prime bank bills” during the fix window. They were also accused of sharing information on their BBSW rate exposures.

The US class action followed court cases initiated by ASIC, alleging that each of the four big banks had rigged or attempted to rig BBSW for their own financial benefit.

In that case, ANZ, CBA and NAB provided enforceable undertaking to address their BBSW conduct, while Westpac took its case to court. The court ruled that Westpac had acted unconscionably but its traders did not manipulate the rate. The bank was fined $3.3 million and ordered to pay ASIC’s costs.

 

 

 

 

 

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use